in his committee.
"Considering the initial gifts of the $250 million state-of-the-art distillery, the $50 million start-up funding, the 50 percent Cover Over tax subsidy kick-back, all additional local tax incentives, and the unbelievable subsidy on molasses, one can only conclude that this $6 billion largesse was designed to only benefit the British liquor conglomerate -- at the expense of U.S. taxpayers," Deposada concluded.